- That of Obama’s personal involvement in the decisions to use drone attacks against terrorists in Pakistan and Yemen (the breathless New York Times article cites some three dozen White House sources – a group of that magnitude hardly constitutes a leak), including the telling presence of David Axelrod, his campaign director, at the targeting meetings.
- The successful operation that exposed another, upgraded attempt at an ‘underwear bomber’ attack, thereby also exposing our sources and methods, particularly the identity of the double agent involved, which included the participation of Saudi intelligence. It became more sensitive when it was revealed that the agent was not our own, but was being run by the British, who were righteously livid over the revelation.
- The recent details about the series of cyber-attacks against the Iranian nuclear weapons program, which include the previously-discovered Stuxnet and Duqu virus, and now the Flame. There had been wide speculation of a foreign national investment in these highly sophisticated cyberwar programs, centering on the US and Israel, which has now been confirmed. We can expect an increased likelihood of Iranian retaliation against US networks, and who can gainsay them, now that they can characterize it as a justifiable counter-attack?
- The recent conviction of the Pakistani doctor who was instrumental in identifying the whereabouts of Usama bin Laden, to what is essentially life imprisonment (truer still if he is killed in prison), because the White House could not help but gleefully finger him in their backslapping victory dance, starting with John Brennan’s impromptu press conference the next day, which was stupefying in how much he got wrong – and this from the National Counter-Terrorism Advisor who was literally in the room watching the operation in real time.
Frankly, a week ago Sunday, in the Situation Room, we all agreed that we would not release any operational details from the effort to take out bin Laden. That all fell apart on Monday – the next day.
By Wednesday of that week, Gates went to see [National Security Advisor Tom] Donilon, offering up a barbed assessment of how the White House had handled the aftermath of the raid.
‘I have a new strategic communications approach to recommend,’ Gates said in his trademark droll tones, according to an account later provided by his colleagues. What was that, Donilon asked?
‘Shut the fuck up,’ the defense secretary said.
It is amazing to me that this administration needs such incandescently obvious advice, yet still fails to heed it.
Can't agree more. Good write up of this issue.
ReplyDelete