That photo is bad enough, but it could also be tempting for some wag to come up with something like this:
This isn't a one-off; just one of series. For example:
The vacations and outings for Obama and family continue
unabated despite the economic crisis still bound in a staggering recovery, and a recovery if
only on paper. A highly touted 1.7% growth last quarter can barely, if at
all, keep up with simple population growth, and with the Chinese economy continuing to grow in the 7.5% range, it won't take long before we see the
reckoning from our self-inflicted economic doldrums.
Allowing such photographic
equivalents of drivel as this is indicative of the tone-deaf attitude about the visuals associated with vacationing in the Pleasure Dome that is Martha's Vineyard. Add to
that the dispatch of the family dog aboard one of the new MV-22 Osprey that is part of the Marine HMX-1 presidential squadron. These are two very expensive additions that the president isn't allowed to use for himself, but it's fine for his dog. (The aircraft isn't considered sufficiently safe for the Presidential Presence, after bad press around the development of the aircraft and two crashes. To demonstrate his confidence in the new type of Marine aircraft after the last crash investigation, the then-Commandant General James Jones boarded it for its first test flight, accompanied by his wife.)
Residents of the tony get-away for the rich are advised that, if they have complaints about traffic being shut down to accommodate Obama's movements, they are to call or e-mail the White House. This is the effective equivalent of a traffic cop giving you a ticket along with a parting shot of "Have a nice day."
Compare this with the typical Bush 'vacation' at his ranch in Crawford, Texas.
But concern about jobs and the economy during these expensive, taxpayer-paid jaunts? That's for the little people.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome and discussion is open and encouraged. I expect that there will be some occasional disagreement (heaven knows why) or welcome clarification and embellishment, and such are freely solicited.
Consider that all such comments are in the public domain and are expected to be polite, even while contentious. I will delete comments which are ad hominem, as well as those needlessly profane beyond the realm of sputtering incredulity in reaction to some inanity, unless attributed to a quote.
Links to other sources are fine so long as they further the argument or expand on the discussion. All such comments and links are the responsibility of the commenter, and the mere presence herein does not necessarily constitute my agreement.
I will also delete all comments that link to a commercial site.